Jack’s Buzz


College student arrested at snowball fight.
January 23, 2009, 10:06 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

 

 As usual, there is a surprise ending. See if you catch it. I’m disturbed. Am I really expected to believe that it’s a great idea for a cop to arrest a college kid for hitting him in the back with a snowball? A snowball?



Don’t Do Nothing in 2009
December 30, 2008, 5:47 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

2009 should be the year of things not to do. Everywhere I look, people are giving me stuff to do. Lose weight, go to bed early, eat more veg, watch less TV, file your paperwork, blah, blah, blah. Honestly, I’m sick of it. 

Still, if I do nothing, well, nothing gets done. I can’t do nothing. Then I feel worse than I did doing too many things–even if they were the wrong things. Maybe I need to do different things? Maybe Jesus has ideas. 

John 13

1. Stop taking yourself so seriously. Let go of your independence, and let him fill you to the point that you can wash someone’s stinky feet. This will be hard to do.

2. Wash your enemy’s feet too. This will be really hard to do. I’ll have to completely abandon myself; let Christ work through me literally. I cannot be nice to a jerk without… well, I cannot be nice to a jerk, period. Christ will have to do that for me.

3. Start loving people NOT as I want to be loved (I’m so subjective), but as Christ loved me. He raised the bar. I can’t do it. See #1-2.

4. If you’re a preacher, let people ask questions. Jesus did. Most of us who listen to you week in, week out, are really getting tired of you doing all the talking. See #1.

John 14

5. Remember that JESUS is the way, the truth, the life. Not our sermons, programs, teaching, seminaries, or clean bathrooms. Jesus. That’s it. See #1.

6. Pray in Jesus’ name not as a magic incantation, but as his representative. Know what he wants to do before asking ANYTHING in his name. Most of our prayers are terribly presumptuous. See #1 again.

7. Remember that the Holy Spirit talks to all the believers–we’re all priests of God. We seem to be losing that idea. Recapture it. See #1 (OK, all of these start and end with #1, don’t they?).

8. Stop being afraid. Stop being afraid of anything. 

John 15

9. Get into this abiding thing. This may just be a restatement of #1. Whatever. He is trying to live through you and me. All of us at the same time. Let him. The results will change the world and amaze the Executive Committee (who seem to be able to do…nothing). 

10.  Be happy. The world hates you; so what? Be a happy witness. See #1.

Ten is enough. Read the Bible and you might find some more, but they all come back to being happy and filled with Jesus Christ. 

Happy, happy 2009.

Comments Off


Pagan Christianity?
December 27, 2008, 5:48 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Frank Viola (not the pitcher) wrote a book attempting to trace the roots of Western Christian practices. No one noticed until George Barna co-authored a revised version. Bang! This book hits like body blows from a middle-weight contender. Oof! Another and another.

 

When I first told my parents I was reading this book they looked at me with mild curiosity. It reminded me of the time at 15 when I told them I’d wrecked the car. I explained Viola’s idea and their eyes widened. It was one of those moments when one tells his parents something for which they have absolutely no categories. They can neither confirm nor deny. They cannot react other than, “Uh, that’s interesting, son?” Kids live for those moments.

 

Reading Pagan, I found myself reacting as the parent. “Uh, what Frank? Where did you get that?” Fortunately, Frank (and George) have done some homework and given us a footnoted text. Their research is not PhD level (it does not include opposing views), but it’s not chopped liver either. I’d like the book better if Frank lowered his voice (odd how some books give you the feeling that the author is yelling angrily), and included thoughts from the other side of the aisle. 

 

I’m going to skim over the book. For the sake of space, you only get a few of the topics that ran up and sniffed me like a dog at junkyard. 

 

Thesis

Viola and Barna tell us that most church traditions cannot be found in the Bible, but have Pagan Greek or Roman origins, and are, therefore contributing to the death of Western Christianity. They are right about Western Christianity’s need for life, and they make a good case for their cause. Still, I am not completely convinced that the problems they site cause the cancers they find. Like House, we know this pathology has an origin, but we need some more work to make an accurate diagnosis.

 

My conclusion

Read the book. Buy it, read it, mark it up. Read it before Christmas if you can. You will be the hit of every party that you attend. Check the authors’ sources and write a review. Give the book to your friends (or enemies) for Christmas–lovely gift, yes? Ask your small group to go through it when things turn grey in late January and February. You will have lively, toasty discussions, I guarantee! 

 

A few nibbles 

The big deal, according to the authors, is that non-Christian philosophy currently rules the Christian church. As evidence, the authors repeatedly site the passivity that marks most church members’ lives. They strike at the roots of passivity, naming those roots abandonment of Scripture, hierarchical structure, and anonymity among others. 

 

Of course, anyone might shoot a hole or two in their argument by testifying that his or her church gatherings are not anonymous, man-centered, or extra-biblical, but the authors stand on their experience and research. George Barna is, after all, synonymous with first-rate Christian research. He and Frank Viola paint with broad strokes, but how could they do otherwise? In the end, the book reveals much in the Western churches that needs to change. 

 

As for Scripture, Viola and Barna point out many instances where Christian practices link to the Old Testament law, cultural convenience, or pagan practices. They are right to caution believers to look carefully at their church’s practices and decide for themselves if they align with the Lord’s will. In that sense, one must appreciate their slight humility that encourages the brothers and sisters to decide matters for themselves. Despite the allegations of a few of their critics, Viola and Barna make a point not to demand conformity. 

 

Still, the book is so forceful and direct in its language and conclusions that Viola and Barna cannot hep but sound a bit angry. Of course, if they’re right, we should all be angry! Their tone cannot help but suggest that their way is the right way, which is exactly the criticism they level at legacy churches. This has, no doubt, turned many readers off. It might be wise for the authors to adjust their tone even lower in a third edition, and I hope a third is in the works.

 

Clerical hierarchy

Viola and Barna direct their harshest voice at the clergy/laity distinction and clerical hierarchy. They believe that the Christian clergy base their supremacist acts on pagan philosophical grounds. Where Jesus and Paul specifically told Christians not to lord over one another, most Pastors do precisely that. The authors’ reasoning is sound. No less a theologian than Karl Barth wanted to banish the word “laity” from the Christian vocabulary. 

 

Passivity among disciples results from the hierarchical structure that stretches even to the architecture of Christian buildings. People sit back to front instead of facing one another as in one’s living room, so real interaction rarely occurs. Moreover, the Pastor usually acts as chief (only?) spokesman, and often seems to be de facto mediator between the Christian and God. To have one speaker (preacher) week in and week out is a pagan practice. In fact, the sermon, as we know it, is based more on Greek rhetoric than any biblical model. (My professor of preaching colleagues will enjoy dismembering that argument, or its messengers.)

 

New Testament churches allowed, encouraged, even commanded, all Christians to bring a psalm, hymn, or word from the Lord to the ecclesia (gathering). The Christian practice in the early church included far more activity and responsibility from individuals. By elevating preaching (or the Eucharist) above Jesus as the central point of Protestant, Baptist, or liturgical worship, the churches created believers that are void of personal responsibility with God’s word. (I told you Barna and Viola were rough.)

 

Tithing

The authors find the standard practice of tithing to be biblical but not Christian. They believe the tithe is more attached to a pragmatic need to pay for buildings and staff salaries than Christian practices of caring for the poor and widows, and giving out of a joyful heart. 

 

Costumes

Sunday morning costumes–suits, dresses, and clerical robes–also have their roots in paganism. The criticism is not so much that dark magic happens when one wears his or her “Sunday best,” but that it creates a sense of pridefulness where one Christian tries to outdo another. The authors give a wink to contemporary churches’ casual styles, but barely.

 

Education

Christian education does not escape their gaze. Nothing in the New Testament or early church history (before Constantine, 330 AD) can be found to advocate seminaries or Bible colleges. Moreover, the Sunday Schools that started out simply to get impoverished children off the streets have now become programs that teach in way more akin to Plato and the Enlightenment than Jesus or Paul. 

 

The New Testament teaches believers to educate one another as we walk through life: character is education’s goal. Character leads to good decisions and a life abiding in Christ. The Bible was taught as a whole–a holistic collection of narratives, history, experiences, poetry, visions, and reflections on how God works and how people tick. The fully formed, first century disciple seems better equipped than today’s version to know how to pray, how to be a witness, and to make a disciple. 

 

Contemporary Christian education seems to believe that knowledge is the goal that leads to right decisions. The Bible is taught in broken pieces rather than holistically. Proof-texting and eisegesis (reading meaning into the text) are common. Few disciples are fully formed. Many, perhaps the majority, of Western church members spend 40 or 50 years in “Bible studies,” but have no clue how to make spiritually mature decisions or other disciples. 

 

New Testament education focuses on steady, long-term growth toward Christlikeness. It aims to present people to Christ as fully formed disciples. Contemporary education interests itself in efficiency. It aims to fit as many people as possible in a room to teach them the some material. The former offers no prize but Christ and maybe some suffering along the way. The latter offers prizes for completing tasks (certificates and diplomas). The former builds character, the latter builds pride. Ouch!

 

The authors’ goal

In the end, Barna and Viola want Christians to restructure their churches. They see the churches’ waning influence and losing ground to a godless culture day by day. They believe the problem is not that God has grown silent or that he no longer works through his people. Christians have wandered off Christ’s path, steadily going astray for the last 1800 years. The church can find its way by returning to simple New Testament practices. 

 

It seems that Barna and Viola want us all to dress down, read our Bibles, and meet in house churches prepared to say something that indicates we’ve been with God that week. All the Pastors and church staff should find secular jobs, and we should sell all the buildings. The extra money should be used to send apostolic church planters out into the harvest fields, and to care for the poor, the sick, the widows, and prisoners. It’s an intriguing proposal, I admit.

 

Wow, but they are going to make a lot of enemies with that message, aren’t they? What do you think? Please do not make ad hominem arguments (look it up). Tell me why church practices are OK, or not OK. Back up your claims with your stories, or (better) Scripture. What are your experiences? What will you do the same or differently and why? 

 

I told you this book would make you think–unless, of course, you don’t want to think. Last week, I contacted Frank Viola. I wanted to make sure he wasn’t the guy who pitched for the Twins in the 80s. He’s not, but he is a man who deeply wants to follow Christ. In many ways, his work puts mine to shame. I hope he will weigh in on my review, but more than that, I hope we can all work to make our lives pleasing to Jesus. He is Lord of every church and we Western Christians might want to act like it.

Comments Off


WHAT’S ENVIROISM GOT TO DO WITH CHURCH?
September 9, 2008, 8:37 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

I made up a term: enviroism. It’s a shortened form of environmentalism. I made it up by accident–it was a typo–but then I liked it. I intend for it to be a little more acceptable to conservative Christians who seem to have forgotten that we are stewards of God’s Earth. I also want it to be acceptable to younger Christians who are greener than their elders (and still quite conservative). I like the term because it’s easier to say, easier to write, and it sounds cool. We’ll see if it’s sticky. 

It occurs to me that North American Christianity is about to go through a catharsis. Oil (today) is down to $103/barrel, so gas is about $3.50/gallon. This summer’s price spike is already forgotten, but what happens to all the “get in your car and drive 15 miles to us” churches if this is a temporary dip? What if some lunatic in Iran nukes the Saudi oil fields or Israeli Parliament? What if Russia strikes a deal with Venezuela that locks Americans out of importing Venezuelan oil? What if China continues to industrialize at a 30% annual growth rate?  What if terrorists or a Cat 4 storm puts a hurt on 30 or 40 of Shell, Texaco, and Exxon’s Gulf of Mexico drilling platforms? How do you spell $5-a-gallon gas? H-U-R-R-I-C-A-N-E. Think wind turbines or solar panels are the answer? Maybe, but what if North Korea, Vietnam, or France perfects the technology and decides to withhold it from the USA?

If even one of those scenarios plays out, the world as we know it will become chaotic. And we’re just considering the energy side of the puzzle. What about food? What about climate change? What about globalization of markets, income streams, and labor? What if Jamaica invents and protects a new information platform that revolutionizes communication? It’s not out of the question that tomorrow’s big power is barely surviving today (think USA in 1870). 

If things change radically, and they almost certainly will, people may choose to stay home on Sunday and watch (insert Big Name Pastor) on TV, online, or on-not-at-all. Suddenly those pleas for tithes will be easier to ignore. Suddenly, the little Bible study meeting down the street will be easier to try. 

The church will almost certainly grow smaller over the next decade. More, smaller churches relating in networks looks promising. Home groups will gain traction as the world gets Hot, Flat, and Crowded, which is the name of Thomas Friedman’s latest book (see link at right column). Friedman is the best-selling author of The World is Flat, where he told us how the information explosion is changing everything. Friedman employs excellent research and readability in Hot, Flat, and Crowded, to tell us how the current focus on global climate change and urbanization are about to (you guessed it) change everything again.     

A hotter earth means more weird weather. Vacations get unpredictable so people stay home. A hotter planet means higher energy bills, more media attention on staying home, and less nonessential travel of any sort. It becomes cool to attend the neighborhood church–especially if they download thought-provoking and excellent biblical teaching from a fantastic communicator from anywhere on the globe. 

A flatter earth means that hierarchical structures continue to wane in influence. People do not want to be told what to do anyway. They like freedom, and they like to buy-in on group decisions. 

Denominational structures and old-line church brands are already dying. As the workplace and education flattens, the church will follow (thank you Internet). Interestingly, the church that Jesus designed seems pretty flat already. He is the Boss and we are not supposed to play favorites. 

That’s not to say there are not leaders. A flat world does not begrudge leadership–it flocks to it. A flat world merely means that information can no longer be stored in one’s personal silo and dispensed as a valuable and limited commodity. You can get to the information just like anyone else. The sources are open to you. You (if you can read and get online) can be the expert because anyone can learn anything rather easily. Flat earth means smaller, localized church gatherings because we will no longer need a “sage on the stage,” but we will still need relationships, correction, and love. Lots of love. Have you noticed how little love comes from large bureaucracies, large churches, large crowds, large stores, large anything? Love happens in small groups.

Crowds are not loving, and this place is getting more crowded. By 2020, the cities will be bursting. That’s great for landlords, psychological counselors, and people selling funeral arrangements. Not so great for the rest of us because we tend not to feel the love in crowded places. Some of the loneliest people live in the largest cities. I guess one so rarely sees the same people that it’s hard to make a friend. People in very large cities learn to make friends by scaling it down. 

My uncle lived over 40 years in Manhattan, 35 in the same building, and 28 in the same apartment. When he died, the people in his building threw a party in his memory. He had about two dozen very close friends–two-thirds of whom lived in his building. People like local. As the planet gets more crowded, the church will become smaller. 

What do you think? Are the days of the mega-churches numbered? Will multi-sites in smaller venue create even larger mega-church brands? Do you think that a vibrant small group ministry will be the key? How will enviroism effect the ministries at your church, or will it?

Comments Off


I JUST BOUGHT A RICE COOKER.
August 24, 2008, 8:42 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Steve Lewis put out a “Challenge to Seattle Hipsters” to do something meaningful, which is a very good challenge to make to hipsters who are often way too deep into lattes and relationship building with other hipsters. Steve challenged them (and me) to buy a rice cooker for a Burmese refugee. I bit and I bought.

I am not a Seattle hipster. I’m not a New Orleans hipster either. I might be considered a hipster at a Baptist seminary faculty meeting, which is rather disturbing, is it not? I’d rather be called the “subversive element.” 

To the point, I quote my friend Steve:

  1. . . . a few months ago, everyone in the hip, flavor of the month activist issue club both here in Seattle, and around North America got all up in arms over the violence in Burma/Myanmar. It did get bad there, no question.  The violence by the government against Buddhist monks got the most airplay in Western media. It’s good that we see this stuff.  But it’s a far cry better when you can actively do something positive to help.

  2. . . . I’ve got a prime opportunity for you to get personally involved – a chance to put up or shut up as it were.  Here’s the deal.  There are many refugees from Burma/Myanmar arriving in the Seattle area right now.  In many cases, they’re arriving with literally nothing but the clothes they’re wearing.

  3. A local pastor in the collective of churches I work with is reaching out to these people and trying to help. He needs help. They need everything from a bus or vans to microwave ovens and rice cookers. So what say you? . . . If you’re interested in helping [click]  

  4. www.seattlegiving.comindex.phpmain_page=index&cPath=19_33_499

  5. . . . this call for help goes beyond just those who were hipster protest-y types. These folks could use all the help they can get right now.

After I read his post, I asked Steve if they were taking the Gospel along with the rice cookers. They are. So, I bought a rice cooker. I’ll never see it, never know its color, feel its buttons, plug it in, or taste its Jasmine grains. I do not care in the least. I send it along joyfully and with a prayer: Father, send your Holy Spirit with this rice cooker. Use it to make someone happy. Let every grain of rice it cooks be a seed for the Gospel. Start a movement among the Burmese people. In Jesus’ name, amen.

Comments Off


A sermon or just a good talk?
August 22, 2008, 1:14 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

I hear a lot of speeches in church gatherings, but not too many sermons. Many opinions, but not many words from God. I asked my spiritual warfare class if their worship gatherings tend to center on “a sermon or a good talk.” One of my brighter students asked what’s wrong with a good talk?

Good question. I see several problems. If people come to a church gathering expecting a word from God (sermon) and get a word from human (good talk), at least two bad things happen.

First, people forget how to tell the difference between humanist meandering and God’s word. We of flesh and bone become comfortable with humanistic entertainment in place of Christ-centered motivation. We see this everywhere in North America as we’ve become a people in love with consumption and ear tickling.

Second, people who anticipate hearing God’s word grow very tired of speakers who call themselves preachers but do not deliver. No likes broken promises. Who knows how many people skip church because when they went they heard no God-sized messages? How many Christians want to hear the day’s word on what to do but find themselves disappointed?

My wife and I travel to many churches and find ourselves numb over the number of preachers who cannot preach. We would probably be happier had we heard a few good talks, but most if it was plain oatmeal. Hardly the stuff to make churches want to stand against the schemes of the devil!

Perhaps it’s time that North American church gatherings repented of soft-sell entertainment and regurgitated motivational blather. If we want holy results to fight the unholy enemy, we might use the tools God gave us. We might gather with less focus on looking good and more prayer for lost souls, by name, out loud, in public. We might pray for our persecuted brothers and sisters in Africa, China, India, and the Middle East. We might jettison the 30-second arrow-to-heaven prayer and really pray together, on Sunday, when everybody’s there.

We might insist the music be less “special” and more worshipful. Less “sacred tradition” and more in a language we can understand.

We might forego the “fake shake” and let fellowship happen more naturally at another time. People do not make friends with a greeting and a greeting–despite its warm intentions–ALWAYS breaks any sense of worshipful momentum.

Most of all, we might insist that preachers preach a sermon. Stop rewarding them if they don’t, and start following them if they do. Stop tolerating people who criticize biblical preaching, put them out! Stop giving status to people who unfairly criticize, build factions, or distract other listeners.

I am NOT advocating long, harsh angry sermonizing. Lord, spare us from mean, long-winded pulpiteers. The best sermons I hear–the ones that offer hope and make me want to keep fighting–are under 30 minutes, to the point and based on a biblical text. They rarely rhyme and almost never alliterate. Good preachers rarely depend on Power Point. They have a remarkable way of demonstrating confident humility, love, and holy living. If a preacher cannot preach, perhaps we can love him toward another job. By all means, let us stop playing into the devil’s hand by putting up with boring or humanistic talking.

Preaching is not boring, nor is it harsh. It’s God talking to us through a person. We need it. We need church gatherings to advance the kingdom of Jesus in an increasingly dark world.

Comments Off


What’s Killing Christianity?
August 21, 2008, 9:34 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

This just in from our friend Billy: The Law is THE BIGGEST DANGER TO CHRISTIANITY. What? Billy? I know Hurricane Fay went over your head and parked. I know you have an energized, 4-year-old daughter (or is she 5 now?). I know the boys (newborn twins) never let you sleep. I know you’re planting a church. But . . . the Law is the biggest danger to Christianity? It’s not the devil? Not the government schools? Not the democrats? Not higher taxes or lower morals? Not the Muslims? Not even Hollywood? Not nominalism, liberalism, Calvinism, humanism, or the gender inclusive Bible? IT’S THE LAW?

In fairness to Billy, he is a good thinker, and just might be onto something. Here’s his post.

Here’s my reply:

Billy’s post if very interesting. Ironic also–it was one of the topics of discussion in my Spiritual Warfare class this morning. Not that the Law is the biggest danger to Christianity (it’s not by the way), but that the Law that Jesus fulfilled is often something to which Christians return for security. It’s as though the devil says something (in a voice like Heath Ledger’s Joker voice) similar to: “Freedom? Oh, that’s so hard to deal with. You have to make so many decisions about everything. Why not just make a rule? Rules are so much easier to follow.” And we less than biblically literate Christians of a Western mindset follow along making checklists and rules to demonstrate our Christian commitment. We seem to emphasize the things Jesus said not to do, and find ourselves lacking in the thing he said to do, which is to love people (John 13:34-35).

Rather than love, we rule. Jesus’ church growth principle does not say that people will know who we serve by how we rule, but that the world will measure us by how we love. Billy rightly points out that people look at him funny when he tells them to love others. Of course they do, we have not shown them how. Ask them how to dictate to people, and they’ll get with it–we all know how to be wonderful little dictators. On the other hand, ask anyone if he or she knows when he or she is being loved or not loved. Pack a Snickers bar when you ask someone for a story about a time when she she was not loved, you’re not going anywhere for awhile.

If people know objectively when they’re not being loved, then they know objectively when they are being loved. Tell them to do the loving stuff to others–they’ll get it. Jesus told us how to be loving as well. Matthew 7:12: treat people like you want to be treated. Nevertheless, Jesus told us to love, not to rule. Simple. If you lied, own up to it and stop lying. Don’t mess around with other women. Don’t curse people. Talk nice. Think about what the other guy needs, just what you need. If the Bible corrects your behavior, accept it and thank the person who brought you that correction–they’re trying to make you wise. Don’t leave everything for someone else to do–pitch in and help. If you made a mess with someone, go to him and clean it up. Grow up for goodness sakes. Respect people; that’s what it means to love others and that’s fairly easy to measure but not as easy as a set of rules. Jesus did not seem to care that one is harder than the other, did he?

We were not told to abandon the law, that’s why I say it is not the big danger. We were simply told that the law no longer binds us. We were told to love, so the big danger is acting unloving or selfish. The biggest danger to Christianity is the pervasive human desire for selfishness. We might call that sin, but not in the sense that the world is loaded with sin and in open rebellion to Christ, which it is. I mean sin in the sense that Christ’s followers are open to sin and do not seem to care much about getting past it.

In the USA, we have traded a selfless love of Christ and desire to advance his kingdom for a sappy, unsatisfying, Wal-Martized, consumer-driven, self-centered religiosity and called it church, which it ain’t. It is sin.

The next great spiritual awakening will start after we tell unloving Pastors, Deacons, and Institutional leaders to take a hike. No, that does not mean that we act unloving to people who act unloving. It means we help them get over their unloving attitudes and actions because loving others is so critical to the advancement of Christianity. Right now, the tendency (in the American church) is to say something like, “The leaders are mean-spirited. I’m leaving.” That is an unloving act. A loving act says, “The leaders are mean-spirited. I’m going to pray for them. I’m going to study the Bible to be sure I am on the right track. I’m going to try to see things from their point of view. I’m going to get wise counsel. Then I will offer Scriptural correction. If they fire me, then I will join those who suffer for righteousness and not those who suffer for foolishness. If they do not take my correction, then I will ask God to find me a new place to serve.” Telling someone to take a hike involves a lot more steps that you imagined, doesn’t it? Maybe that’s why we don’t do it–it’s tiresome, painful, and it takes a lot of time. Love takes time.

Oh, by the way, it starts with me. I have to love people first.

So, in a way, Billy is right that the Law is a big problem. I just think that rather than telling people “get past the Law” we will have better results by telling them, “All you need is love.” Shoot, they’ll sing that one.

Comments Off


McCain, Obama & Rick Warren
August 17, 2008, 1:24 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

I’m watching my favorite Southern Baptist Pastor, Rick Warren, masterfully question two of the world’s most powerful men. Barack Obama is surprisingly polished, sensible, and hopeful. John McCain is surprisingly humorous, decisive, clever, and specific. I like decisive specificity, and no, I was not predisposed to one, lockstep, party or candidate (surprise!).

The program shows again on CNN Sunday night at 7:00 CT. I’m sure it will be available on cnn.com and YouTube anytime after that. For the life of me I cannot imagine how anyone can decide for whom to vote apart from these important conversations. Please watch and decide prayerfully. Please don’t be shallow.

Comments Off


Academic Irrelevancy
August 15, 2008, 7:44 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Several of us are wondering about the future of academia. Just as the information crush and fuel crises change entertainment, housing, and work, I guarantee you they’ll change education. Here’s what’s in store:

1. Free. MIT put all their courses online. Free. They’re betting that you’ll get a taste of the world’s best tech education and want more. More will cost you, but because you know what you’re buying, you’ll gladly pay. The rest of us still think you’ll buy our product based on reputation alone. We are naive.

2. Online. Online courses tend to cost significantly more than traditional, residency-based courses. People are flocking to them in fantastic numbers. These two points seem at odds until we factor in the enormous physical and emotional cost of relocating from a home environment to a campus. When you’re 18 it’s unually fun and exciting to leave home. With vast numbers of older, nontraditional students, leaving home, work, and friends becomes less fun. Online courses open doors for millions of people for whom relocation is a bad option.

Liberty University’s online seminary has 10,000 students. We have 3,500 and we’re one of the biggest. I have about 25-30 residency students each year. I have 40 waiting for me to get classes online. (Workin’ on it guys.)

There’s an irony here. I’ve been working on putting courses in a simplified format for 4 years. I need help with audio, video, Internet. This year our school administrators mandated that every professor develop an online class, and they provided resources! I like it.

3. Certificates. The Wall Street Journal carried an outstanding opinion piece Wednesday explaining the fallacy and irrelelevance of the traditional bachelor’s degree. Suffice to say that it teaches a lot of stuff you do not need to know and fails to teach a lot of stuff you do need to know. Same with MDiv–all of us who earned one complained about the “Bottom 10.” The useless classes we took to meet requirements but knew we did not need. We endured them as hazing required to join the club. The problem, of course, is that churches are firing Pastors for stuff not learned at seminary–stuff seminaries do not teach or teach too little of (church planting, systems, systemic church evangelism, small group discipleship, relational skills, financial management, and personnel management to name a few). Our school is buying into Certificates as well. Hallelujah!

Certificates promise to change some of that irrelevance with focused, specialized training. They also invite more students to participate in the lifelong learning journey. Moreover, a guy with 15 years of successful business management experience alongside a certificate in church leadership just might make a better Pastor than a guy who shelved books at the seminary library while earning his MDiv. Potential church planters with a certificate and 5 years of apprentice training alongside an experienced church planter will get my vote almost every time.

4. Leveling. We live in a hierarchical country. Have degrees versus don’t. Most of the stats show that a person with a college degree gets paid much more than a person without the degree. That’s about to change.

Increasingly, people will pay for value. They will care little for people with letters following their names unless those people add value. If the preacher is boring, the crowd will attend the satellite church down the street–the one with the great communicator on TV, and campus Pastors with teaching and counseling certificates.

As usual, the Internet changes everything. Maybe it will lower the hyper inflation of higher ed costs and increase participation. Let’s hope so.

Comments Off


Plenty of problems, but 1 million iPhones still sold
July 14, 2008, 3:31 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

The latest iPhone is a huge hit, and a huge PR debacle for Apple, all in the same day. Let’s see if we can think of some lessons for the American church.

In case you’ve been on Mars, the iPhone 3G was launched Friday. Howling customers could be heard in every major city. Still, Apple sold 1 million units. Here’s the story: Plenty of problems, but 1 million iPhones still sold – Technology Live – USATODAY.com

Here are some lessons:

1. When you go public, expect problems. Murphy’s law is very real as Mr. Jobs realized sometime Friday morning. Whatever can go wrong will. So, why not plan for something to go wrong? Church: your sound system will never fail after the service, but always between the sound check that ran to perfection and the chorus of the first song. Have a backup plan–like learning to go unplugged.

Apple could easily have solved their problem by anticipating that iTunes servers would crash from demand. They have enough money for a temporary redundancy to handle the load. Churches don’t so we have to be a little more creative, but we can still anticipate catastrophic failure of the gizmos.

2. Treat people better than expected. Apple made their customers wait in line for a new iPhone. That, in itself is not a problem we’re having in churches these days, nor is it really a problem for Apple. The problem was that once they came inside, people could not get waited on and–because of the crash–their new phones did not work.

Apple got big because it treats it’s customers better than the other tech companies. Last Friday Apple (and AT&T) dropped from excellent to normal by making their customers wait in the heat to spend a lot of money for a product that did not work as promised. They lost their edge and their customers will make them pay. Those who were on the fence will now wait to buy an iPhone or will buy a different product. Expect Apple to offer some freebies to people who were unhappy last Friday. They understand the market.

I’m not comparing the church of Jesus Christ to a plastic cell phone company, but there is a lesson here. The church got big because it treated people with love. In the Book of Acts, the church goes out of its way to love outsiders. Today’s church too often acts unloving and it makes claims and promises we cannot fulfill (like we’ll love you better than the world does).

If we make no false promises, but stick to what God says is in store for His people (the church), we can expect a better result. If we keep our basic promise (love God and love others), we can expect amazing results. Moreover, if we repent for false promises–and outright lies–of the past, we may get some of those on the fence to cross over our way.

3. People will look past problems to get hold of a good thing. Last year’s iPhone sold like crazy. It was gobbling market share like an 80s Pacman game. The new iPhone is selling even faster. To sell one million of anything costing that much in three days is unheard of, but it’s not unlike what happened in the Middle East during the first hundred or so years of Christianity.

The Day of Pentecost saw God’s power in action. People converted to Christianity in amazing numbers. Churches formed all over the region in only a few years. They “turned the whole world upside down” and had “an excellent reputation among outsiders.” The churches thrived even though they had enormous problems. Best I can tell, the only churches doing things well were those at Philippi and Smyrna. The majority of the New Testament is written to churches with major problems.

The American church of 2008 has big problems too. If we do not listen to Scriptural principles and make corrections, many churches will die. At the same time, the church holds the greatest promise of all: salvation and peace with God. Though we have some problems, our product is outstanding.

Let’s refocus on  our core message: the Gospel of Jesus Christ. People will respond.