Jack’s Buzz


Is the nation’s Capitol turning Pagan?
May 23, 2008, 10:06 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

I’m in Washington D.C. on Memorial Day weekend. It’s 70 degrees and sunny–a perfect Chamber of Commerce day. This is Janet’s first visit. I’m excited to show her the National Gallery, the Mall, and all the monuments and memorials to our country’s greatness. I’m glad that I get to visit the WWII Memorial–Tom Hanks hadn’t built it the last time I was here. I hope to be able to thank a genuine WWII veteran for saving our world from evil men. I did that at the Vietnam War Memorial when I was here several years ago. I thanks a big old guy with a long gray pigtail, black leather jacket, and a million tattoos. He looked me right in the eye and cried. War memorials do that to you. We prayed together and he thanked me and hugged me until my spine cracked twice. There’s a lot of Christianity and hugging at war memorials too.

There are people in our country who are scared that our nation is leaving her Christian roots for paganism. Washington’s elite certainly do not seem to be good Christians–yes I am referring to Hillary, Obama, and McCain. Many Christians see California courts declaring the righteousness of homosexual marriage, and the bland if not militant acceptance of same by the politicians, and they get a little scared.

If you look around and wonder about things becoming too pagan, here’s a little piece from a good writer.

When grave persons express their fear that England is relapsing into Paganism, I am tempted to reply, ‘Would that she were.’ For I do not think it at all likely that we shall ever see Parliament opened by the slaughtering of a garlanded white bull in the House of Lords or Cabinet Ministers leaving sandwiches in Hyde Park as an offering for the Dryads [Druids]. If such a state of affairs came about, then the Christian apologist would have something to work on. For a Pagan, as history shows, is a man eminently convertible to Christianity. He is, essentially, the pre-Christian, or sub-Christian, religious man. The post Christian man of our own day differs from his as much as a divorcee differs from a virgin. The Christian and the Pagan have much more in common with one another than either has with the writers of the New Statesman; and those writers would of course agree with me. – C.S.Lewis, “Is Theism Important? A Reply,” Socratic Digest (1952).

We have little to fear from the Pagans. We might want to consider that Christianity has become more irrelevant to more people, and we live far deeper in a post-Christian culture than the one of which Dr. Lewis wrote 56 years ago.

I do not for one minute, however, fear that America has embraced a post-Christian secularity. I fear the God for whom we Christians act as ambassadors. I fear the One who holds all authority, and who told us to be his witnesses to all the nations (Matt. 28:18-20, Acts 1:8). I fear the One who told his disciples (us) to love one another so that “all men will know that you are my disciples” (John 13:34-35). I fear the One whose commands his disciples seem to take so lightly.


5 Comments

Uh, hello Matt. Your post is a good one, but you might want to make sure you know with whom you’re interacting. Your latest comment seems to be directed to Joe.
As for me, I do not disagree with your statements. Again, you are intelligent and well informed. I planted a church in NM and came in contact with neo-paganism, neo-wicca, and, since living in New Orleans a new one,neo-barbarianism. The latter is by far the scariest of the three.
My point, as was Lewis’s, seems to have been overlooked. Lewis is telling us that a Pagan is easier to introduce to Jesus than what they (we) had (have) become: secular.
The good old West is not about to become Pagan. We aren’t even remotely Pagan in either the old or neo sense of that religion. We’re traditionally Christian, living in a post-Christian culture, and becoming hyper-secular. The most important and interesting (I think) part of Lewis’s work, and the reason that I quoted him was two-fold. 1. He recognized England as post-Christian in 1952. They were far more church-going then than we are today, yet we have a rather feisty argument going as to the problem in the US. 2. He realized that Christians did not have the fainest idea as to what they should really be worried about–not men at all, but the God who holds our souls in His hand.
Be blessed. Keep thinking.

Comment by Jack Allen

You are missing my point, it is not just post-Christian SECULARITY that is emerging, there are also significant currents of post-Christian SPIRITUALITY that are pagan literally and not just euphemistically.

In using the word “pagan” as euphamistically as you do, you miss the fact C S Lewis was talking about polytheists, not atheists or agnostics. And what I am referring to is post-Christian revival of polytheism, not agnosticism or agnosticism. So we have a situation of post-Christians drawing on pre-Christian religion in a way rather more complex and widespread than C S Lewis was able to envision back in his day (interestingly enough the Druidism Lewis mentions is a part of this). That Christians are failing to adequately communicate the gospel into this situation should be a concern. God is being faithful, but the church has neglected its mission.

Now, coming to nominal Christianity, that’s a different issue again. That’s more of an internal issue than the external issue C S Lewis speaks of.

Comment by Matt Stone

…roll, not role…

Comment by Joe David Smith

I don’t believe that the problem is a post-Christian secularity. I think it’s more of a ‘never-was-a-Christian’ problem. The ‘non-Christian members’ of our churches who fill the pew and are on the role but who have no real desire to align their wills and hearts with God – those assuming adherence to religious rule and ritual is good enough – now THAT’s something to cause some to worry.

Maybe we’ve grabbed onto a mixed-bag of beliefs or used the ‘buffet’ approach to God. In either case we’ve chosen the wide gate leading to destruction.

Ahhh. Would that they who profess a belief act as if their belief had transformed them…

Comment by Joe David Smith

What has emerged amongst other things is post-Christian paganism / wicca. Sort of plays havoc with your use of language here.

Comment by Matt Stone